Carpenters In The Forehead/ The Tea Party: A Valid Premise Hidden In Their Rants PDF Print E-mail
AppEd - Opinions and Editorials - AppEd - Opinions and Editorials
Written by Jeff Davis   
Tuesday, 11 May 2010 20:56

Carpenter_2

I will be the first to admit that I have not followed all that closely the Tea Party, given that my superficial impression from newspaper reports has been that they are mostly a gang of ultra-right fundamentalists who are against anything that has to do with the government.  They constantly portray President Obama as leading a “galloping socialist agenda” while continuing to claim that he is not really a U. S. citizen.  They have allegedly spewed racial epithets, spit at Congressmen, screamed homophobic comments, and generally come across as a group who might welcome those of Timothy McVeigh’s ilk.

 

Fringe elements?  From the dark side?  I’m sure there is an element of both found within their ranks, but when you take the time to contemplate their rant of less government, there certainly is to be found an element of truth when considered from a strictly economic viewpoint.

 

If you want to believe what most academic economists are telling us, crunch time is just around the corner for the United States, as well as many other nations.   Our national debt has ballooned to the point where it is about to burst, and if investors lose confidence that we can pay our bills, the money-lenders who have supported our prolific spending will stop buying all of those Treasury bonds.   Interest rates will begin to soar, unemployment will go even higher, and the prospects for another recession will loom over our heads.

 

It remains a fact that you can overspend only up to a certain point, and then the house comes crashing down: the party is over.  The options at that time become painful for all, and none of the choices for getting out of the mess are very pretty:  the government can drastically cut back on services and programs, or raise taxes, or a combination of both; the currency can be devalued; or the debt can be diminished by allowing inflation to run rampant.

 

Witness what is happening in Greece, another nation with a government that spends money like it grows on trees.  The retirement age is a super-generous 61, government employees have jobs for life, and tax evasion runs rampant.  But the over-leveraged chicken has come home to roost, and with little choice available at this time, draconian austerity measures have been imposed.  Many people are going to be hurting for a very long time as a result.

 

It appears that our day of reckoning may be just around the corner as well.  Government debt is now about 90% of our gross national product, household debt is still through the roof, and as consumers we are once again starting to spend more and save less. Others will be willing to finance our debt only as long as there is credence that we can pay back the loans, and when that confidence disappears, they will call in their chips.  Interest rates will take off, and there goes our economic recovery.

 

This is by no means an endorsement that the government was wrong to step in at the time of our recent financial meltdown.  This was a crisis of epic proportions, and the Tea-Party is flat-out wrong that the government should have let our financial system go into a freefall.  It is a rare economist who does not agree that the amount of suffering would have been immeasurably more drastic if the government had not intervened, especially with the much-maligned TARP program.  The recession hit with full force in essentially every other country as well, and their governments did the same as ours:  stimulus spending to prop up their economies while waiting for private investment and markets to recover.  This occurred in most countries in Europe and Asia, and as a result, there was a softening of the recession. To have governments sit idly by while the world’s finances crash around them would have created a potential nightmare-scenario of social disruption.

 

Members of Congress have been harping for years about reigning in this unending upward spiral of debt but have never had the gumption and political will to actually do anything about it.  The biggest problems are in our so-called entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare, and there can be no fix until our populace comes to the realization that there must be cut-backs.  Another disaster-in-waiting which is seldom mentioned, but lurks for hundreds of thousands of workers, is the fact that many pensions are significantly underfunded.  We have caught just a glimpse of this in our own neck of the woods as the Maryland state government indicated a desire to pass on the responsibility of funding state teachers’ retirement funds to the local county governments, and that is going to be quite a hefty burden to bear.

 

With human nature as it is, changes will not likely be made until an irreversible crisis develops.  Just like the attitude of “not in my backyard,” people will resist till the bitter end any cuts in their benefits or government-funded programs that are to their advantage. In fact, I would bet that this holds true just the same for the Tea Party folk who claim to be so adamantly against everything and anything government.

 

Consider a couple of small, but illustrative examples of the difficulty in enacting change.  The U.S. Postal Service, where red ink flows all over the envelopes, runs a deficit of billions of dollars every year and yet faces strong opposition to ending Saturday deliveries and closing small, inefficient rural offices.  These are considered sacrosanct entitlements in the eyes of many, and the powers that be have consistently resisted any changes that make economic sense.  Ditto for our anitquated system of farm subsidies and price supports that go almost exclusively to those who are already quite well-off.   I'm sure it will be a cold day in hell before any congressmen in farm states vote against these perks that have been around so long that they are also considered entitlements.

 

The future doesn’t look so rosy for our nation of spenders whose consumption of goods seems to be a bottomless pit.  Government services and benefits will have to be decreased, and yes, read my lips, taxes will have to be raised.  This can be done in an orderly, focused fashion, or we can wait for circumstances beyond our control to take over.

 

Tighten our belts, or prepare for the dire consequences:  the hammer of austerity is lying in wait and ready to smack us in the head.   And don’t blame it on Carpenters In The Forehead:  you have been forewarned.

Last Updated on Tuesday, 11 May 2010 21:49
 
Comments (20)
Spoken like a true bourgeoise liberal corporatist.
J.D.Tuckley
Tuesday, 11 May 2010 22:50
While I agree that U.S. citizens are generally a bunch of self-indulgent pigs who live far beyond their means as well as far beyond the natural capacity of the planet to support them, I would emphatically disagree that the cause of this unfolding global economic catastrophe is government spending on social programs. The problem is Milton Friedman "Chicago School" economics as taught in business schools, orchestrated by gangsters masquerading as legitimate corporate executives, and enforced by police, militaries and intelligence agencies for the financial benefit of billionaires and the people be damned. Honestly. Didn't you people learn anything from my nearly ten-years of locally published newspaper letters?
actually--
J.D.Tuckley
Tuesday, 11 May 2010 23:41
I think that you folks don't have nearly as much to be smug about as you think you do.
Here's an example of how the Cumberland Times-News spins every possible issue toward the corporate Right--
J.D.Tuckley
Wednesday, 12 May 2010 12:04
Quite a few people here in WV 1st district voted against Mollohan not only because of the ethics corruption probes, but also because he's an arrogant, corporate-elitist jerk who has consistently voted in support of Wall Street gangsters. But according to the psychopaths at the CTN, people voted him out of office because he was too "liberal" on women's healthcare rights.
The CTN is controlled by far-right corporate fascist psychopaths.
J.D.Tuckley
Wednesday, 12 May 2010 12:37
So naturally, it greatly behooves these psychopaths to consistently, day-in and day-out, paint everyone in this area as perhaps being even farther to the right in their personal opinions as even themselves. Therefore, any semblance of reason ever appearing in the CTN is deliberately placed there for the purpose of fooling people into thinking that the editorial positions of the paper are perhaps not quite as far toward the fascist-right as the opinions and position of its readers. But the fact is, that the CTN itself consistently paints "the people" as being far, far right, which is a dishonest characterization to begin with; therefore, leaving the REAL far, far, far right CTN propagandist psychopaths who control the CTN some leeway to themselves appear somewhat balanced at times. After all, it wouldn't really work very well if the CTN started to actually admit to the fact that quite a few people in this area actually do hold very progressive positions on a wide variety of issues. This would put the CTN in the difficult position of having to convince intelligent people to adopt irrational, pro-corporate opinions on a regular basis. Far easier for the CTN to simply and dishonestly start from the premise that everyone reading the paper is already as far to the right as they, and even farther in some cases. It's all smoke and mirrors; dishonest corporate-right propaganda media techniques.
The last thing the psychopaths who control the CTN want is for the people of this area to understand the truth.
J.D.Tuckley
Wednesday, 12 May 2010 13:05
The last thing they want is for the people of this area to understand that for the past 30 years the top echelon of this country has been waging a ruthless and brutal class-war against them. The last thing the psychopaths who control the CTN want is for the people of this area to actually bind together in community to protect themselves against the big corporate-interests that are raping them and systematically destroying their lives.
Congratulations to the CTN--
J.D.Tuckley
Thursday, 13 May 2010 10:48
Through your AP release selection for today's edition (May 13) you seem to have made a half-hearted attempt to actually inform people regarding a couple of important issues, rather than just reinforcing mindless stereotypes and catering to vulgar prejudices as is usually the case.
OK, CTN--
J.D.Tuckley
Thursday, 13 May 2010 14:38
Wal-Mart has announced its intention to donate about 0.00001% of its quarterly profits to providing food for the hungry. Here's your chance to make a really, really big deal out of this in tomorrow's edition. But whatever you do, don't tell the locals that Wally World is only doing this for the purpose of generating good PR in their effort to penetrate urban markets.
U.S. debt approaching 100% of GDP
J.D.Tuckley
Sunday, 16 May 2010 09:35
This means we will soon owe as much as we annually produce. The current administration has increased the size of our wars and the "defense" budget, in addition to the massive bailouts of banksters and other ruling Forces of Greed (FOG).

It is expected the corporate welfare will continue on behalf of the FOG who finance our elections for control.

President Obama has appointed a commission to find out how we can address the debt. They are not expected to recommend wars be reduced in size, cuts to some of the thousand foreign military bases, or in any way that we stop producing weapons systems which don't work and aren't needed, or quit giving fortunes to banksters who immediately award themselves billions in bonuses.

Instead, it is expected that Obama's commission will recommend that the masses have their Social Security and Medicare cut, the few programs where taxpayers actually get something back for their massive contribution.
More daily lies from the Cumberland TImes-News.
J.D.Tuckley
Sunday, 16 May 2010 14:43
Read the book "Toxic Sludge is Good for You" by Sheldon Rampton and John Stauber.
I bet their heads are exploding over at the CTN office--
J.D.Tuckley
Monday, 17 May 2010 08:37
A stunning, 24 year-old Muslim-American of Lebanese descent has been crowned Miss USA. And she supports insurance companies having to pay for birth control!
Hey CTN psychopaths--
J.D.Tuckley
Monday, 17 May 2010 09:54
Hundreds of U.S. banks have failed since the Fall of 2008, and so far this year another 68 have failed. Why don't you do a story on this? You can completely ignore the fact that deregulation is the reason for this, and lie to everybody by claiming that the U.S. banking industry is stronger than ever, because the remaining assets in all of these "inefficient" regional banks are being swallowed up by larger banks.
Here's an idea!
J.D.Tuckley
Monday, 17 May 2010 10:32
Hey CTN psychopaths-- why don't you just run a nice article and photo about the Miss USA 1st runner-up, a fine, upstanding Oklahoma blonde Christian who supports the racist, Arizona anti-immigrant legislation? Then at the very end of the article, you can just only mention that the pageant winner was some woman from Michigan.
Milton Friedman's Chicago school of economics
Jeff Davis
Monday, 17 May 2010 10:40
J.D.....I think that the Obama administration would agree with you that Friedman's economic theories are sorely lacking when faced with a situation like the recent meltdown of the U.S. financial system. Instead, the government embraced the concepts of John Maynard Keynes and intervened to mitigate the disaster. Thus, while private sector investment and spending shriveled, the government took up the slack with rather massive stimulus programs. From what I have read, almost all economists agree that this was the only way to prevent an even worse outcome.

I would also agree that government spending on social services are not solely at the heart of the problem, but it is certainly a major factor when you consider that so-called entitlement programs constitute a considerable percentage of our debt-burden. The fact remains that we have reached a point where these benefits, as well as other government spending, will have to be reined in if we want to remain solvent as a nation.

Your point about spending on defense spending is well taken, and it leaves little room for optimism when you consider that we are spending billions upon billions of dollars on weapons systems that the military doesn't even want but are rammed through by Congressmen who have a very parochial view of our nation's economic plight and who are heavily influenced by military-industrial lobbyists.

In addition, the vaunted concept of our capitalistic economic system being a "free market" that will self-correct, rather than self-destruct, has certainly been laid to waste, and I am all for sensible regulation of the financial sector.
This nation stopped being "solvent" back when Nixon dismantled the Bretton-Woods Agreement.
J.D.Tuckley
Monday, 17 May 2010 11:25
Austerity measures for the general public are commonly known as "structural adjustment programs" when applied to other countries whose economies have been systematically and deliberately destroyed by Chicago School neoliberalism. Adam Smith was not a capitalist. He was a man of the Enlightenment, who advocated for small-scale, locally-based healthy markets where neither the producer or the consumer ever gained sufficient power over the process to influence prices in one direction or the other. If one actually reads "The Wealth of Nations" it is obvious that Adam Smith firmly believed in a visible hand of government (albeit local government) regulating the "invisible hand" of the market. Social spending constitutes a mere drop in the bucket when compared to the untold trillions spent on the so-called national security complex. And in terms of Social Security, I don't know exactly what percentage of SS payouts turn immediately around to be injected right back into the economy, but surely it must be near 100%.

Pentagon spending amounts to trillions, not mere billions, and is simply a conduit by which money is systematically channeled upwards. And Wall Street is a criminal enterprise that needs to be dismantled. The criminality of Wall Street cannot be "reformed" or regulated.

What we need are systemic, institutional level changes, not a continuation of Milton Friedman economics as in domestic structural adjustment programs. And Keynesian theory is not relevant to this situation, because Keynes simultaneously advocates for the regulation of international currency values in relation to each other, in order to prevent massive currency speculation. If one is to apply Keynesian economic theory, one must apply all of it, not just conveniently selected parts of it.
I also fail to see--
J.D.Tuckley
Monday, 17 May 2010 12:35
I also fail to see how simply handing the same criminal Wall Street banks (that got us into this mess) trillions of dollars while demanding absolutely no accountability or control over how they use the money, could warrant being called "Keynesian economics."
I love it.
J.D.Tuckley
Monday, 17 May 2010 15:00
People drive around in huge pickup trucks and SUVs that get 12 mpg, and at the very least, just hop into their cars and drive around without any sense of responsibility toward anything larger than their own self-interest. Then they pat themselves on the back for donating their hair toward the supposed clean-up of a massive oil disaster.
And then, of course--
J.D.Tuckley
Monday, 17 May 2010 18:27
The psychopaths at the newspaper put them on the front page, because if they were to tell people that the oil is gushing at 10x the rate the oil companies and the government are admitting to, and that they may never get it stopped, then the people might come to the unfortunate conclusion that off-shore drilling might not be the best idea in the world, and that perhaps they should simply drive a lot less, and the psychopaths certainly don't want that to happen. They work very hard, day in and day out, to give people absolutely no reason to re-examine their priorities in a fundamental sense. After all, what's the Gulf of Mexico compared to oil stock prices? U.S. corporate media is all money, all the time.
That is to say--
J.D.Tuckley
Monday, 17 May 2010 19:38
God forbid that people around this area should actually begin taking seriously their responsibility to their children and grandchildren for the health of the ecosystem. Why, that might actually lead to a real social community, where four or five neighbors might agree to share someone's minivan for a single trip to the grocery store at a set time each week. What do you think we are? A bunch of socialists or something?
"Bill Arnold"
J.D.Tuckley
Tuesday, 18 May 2010 16:13
I think the Cumberland Times-News features this absolute ignoramus every two weeks because any intelligent and informed person wouldn't even know where to begin to respond to his idiocy, let alone do it in under 300 words.
Simple solution man!!
Mike Nasser
Tuesday, 18 May 2010 21:08
DON'T READ THE PAPER :^) The only thing its good for is emergency toilet paper.

As far as taking care of the environment, well, how many people here drive electric cars, have only solar or wind power at home, etc.?
Please register or login to add your comments to this article.
 
Webappindie.org

What's Happening?